Land InsituteHome

Learn More

We can become more energy secure.
By developing renewable energy sustainably and using less fossil fuels, the U.S. can increase its security.
Got any bright ideas?
If you have opinions on climate and energy issues, let your legislators know.

Receive CEP news & events info in your inbox. Enter your email address & sign up today!

carbon regulation cep news climate change coal energy efficiency energy policy green jobs greenhouse gases kansas policy renewable energy wind

Contact Us | Blog | CEP Projects | Who We Are |

In The News

January 21, 2009
CEP testifies on Renewable Portfolio Standard for KS - HB 2013

Mr. Chairman, members of the committee, good morning and thank you for the opportunity to address you regarding HB 2013.

CEP heartily supports a Renewable Portfolio Standard for Kansas to:

• Increase diversity and security of our energy supply;
• Reduce volatility of power prices, given zero fuel cost;
• Provide additional income to host landowners and counties;
• Create jobs;
• Increase investors’ and developers’ confidence in Kansas prospects;
• Invite manufacturing.

With over 30 existing Renewable Portfolio Standards in the United States, data on challenges and successes is increasingly available.

Reports by EPA, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (linked below) identify key elements of successful policy.

HB 2013 contains many of these successful elements: clearly defined goals, a long timeline to encourage investment, specification of eligible renewable resources, inclusion of net metering capacity toward utility targets, and the selection of KCC to implement.

Additional aspects that would, according to the above reports, strengthen HB 2013 to best practice:

• Consider using energy generation rather than installed nameplate capacity as a target;
• Consider specifying whether existing and out-of-state generation, including federal hydropower and Renewable Energy Certificate purchases, count toward target;
• Consider cost recovery mechanism for utilities;
• Consider enforcement mechanism for noncompliance (alternative compliance payments are frequently used to support new renewable energy generation).
Further possibilities that may serve Kansas:
• Incentives for preferred energy development such as community wind, solar, and distributed generation (Colorado credits in-state electricity at 125% and community-owned wind at 150%);
• REC tracking system to ensure viability of generation to meet target.

CEP drew from the following reports, which contain excellent data for your consideration:

http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy08osti/41409.pdf
http://epa.gov/CHP/state-policy/renewable_fs.html
http://eetd.lbl.gov/ea/ems/reports/lbnl-154e.pdf

--- Nancy Jackson, www.climateandenergy.org

For notes on the hearing, click here.

  • If you would like to find your legislator and contact them about any specific piece of legislation, click here.
  • For specific bill tracking, check out KNRC.
  • For questions on the legislative process, call the Kansas Legislative Hotline - 1-800-432-3924, or check out the legislature's website.
Contact Email: jackson@climateandenergy.org
» Return to In The News
 Back To Top
Print Email
“Iraq and a lot of the skirmishes we are in are about energy. And I think, to put it in a nutshell, we feel it makes more sense to put wind turbines on our prairie instead of our fine young men and women under the prairie."
Kirk Lowell, Concordia KS - home to Meridian Way wind farm
Copyright © Climate + Energy Project, 2012
Website by: Digital Evolution Group