Land InsituteHome

Learn More
We can become more energy secure.
By developing renewable energy sustainably and using less fossil fuels, the U.S. can increase its security.
Got any bright ideas?
If you have opinions on climate and energy issues, let your legislators know.

Receive CEP news & events info in your inbox. Enter your email address & sign up today!

carbon regulation cep news climate change coal energy efficiency energy policy green jobs greenhouse gases kansas policy renewable energy wind

Contact Us | Blog | CEP Projects | Who We Are |
Search
Learn More

In The News
January 8, 2008
Poll: Kansans favor coal plant decision
Published in the Kansas City Star Primebuzz blog, 1/3/2008
by David Klepper and Karen Dillon

 Kansas voters by a 2-to-1 margin agree with the decision by the state to block construction of two coal plants in western Kansas, according to a poll released Thursday.

The poll by Cooper and Secrest Associates, a Democratic political consulting firm, found that the margin of support was less in western Kansas alone, but still a majority — 51 percent, while 40 percent disagreed and 9 percent weren’t sure.

The findings of the poll give the first snapshot of where Kansans stand on the divisive coal plant issue. The poll also showed 75 percent of the likely voters support expanded use of wind energy.

The poll was done mainly for research by the Climate and Energy Project with The Land Institute near Salina. “We did not intend to initially make the poll public,” said Nancy Jackson, head of the Lawrence-based Climate and Energy Project, a non-profit, nonpartisan project sponsored by The Land Institute near Salina. “We found (the responses) striking and surprising. We thought it was worthy of sharing publicly.”

State legislators were quick to try to knock down the poll. Senate President Steve Morris, a Hugoton Republican whose district includes Holcomb, where the plants were to be built, discounted the poll’s major finding. He said energy policy, climate change and the various economic and environmental aspects of the coal plant decision don’t make for easy yes-no poll questions.

“I just can’t imagine that would be an accurate poll,” he said. “Virtually everyone I’ve talked to has been concerned about the decision.”

But Alan Secrest, who owns the Washington-based polling company, said the questions that were posed were fair and balanced. “We went out of our way to articulate both sides often using language made by both supporters and opponents,” Secrest said.

To read more about the findings, see the Friday edition of The Star.

For original article, please go to http://primebuzz.kcstar.com/?q=node/9206
» Return to In The News
 Back To Top
Print Email
Mission
Projects
Staff
Contact/Email
CEP Contacts & Resources
In the News
Site Map
Glossary of Terms
FAQs
Library
Blog
Fact Sheets
...for your home
...for farms & businesses
...for congregations
Work with your legislators
Approximately two-thirds of the world’s population (along with critical infrastructure such as transportation routes, energy processing facilities, and major urban centers) are located near coastlines. All face significant threats from sea level rise.
CNA, “National Security and the Threat of Climate Change,” http://securityandclimate.cna.org/
Copyright © Climate + Energy Project, 2012
Website by: Digital Evolution Group